
        Peripheral-nerve rerouting is an exciting surgical
        procedure that has considerable potential for restoring significant
        function after spinal cord injury (SCI). Basically, with this procedure,
        peripheral nerves (i.e., those outside of the spinal cord and brain)
        emanating from the cord above the injury site are surgically rerouted
        and connected to those below the
        injury site. This reestablishes a functional neuronal connection from
        the brain to previously dormant muscle or sensory systems.
        A key force behind developing this procedure into a
        real-world SCI therapy has been Dr. Shaocheng Zhang,  of Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, China. Because he has treated
        over a 100 people with SCI, he has made routine a seemingly challenging
        neurosurgical procedure. In addition to Zhang’s work, Dr. Giorgio
        Brunelli, University of Brescia, Italy has greatly contributed to
        developing the procedure.
        After I met Zhang at a World
        Health Organization (WHO) SCI conference, he invited me to Shanghai
        last December to become the first American to observe firsthand his
        peripheral-nerve-rerouting surgery. Because his hospital, Shanghai’s
        largest, is military affiliated, this invitation to a Paralyzed Veterans
        of America (PVA) representative clearly was a bridge-building, goodwill
        gesture. It would certainly be a promising sign for the future if
        military-affiliated organizations from two countries that have had
        historically some animosity could work together to find solutions for a
        problem that bows to no flag or political system
        East Meets West: 
        
        
        An impressively modern city with 16-million
        residents, Shanghai is located near the juncture of the Yangtze River
        and the East China Sea. As China enters the World Trade Organization,
        Shanghai seems destined to reclaim its historical role as the
        country’s most international city. 
        Its downtown skyline - with the world’s third tallest
        skyscraper and an even-taller, space-needle-like tower - rivals that of
        virtually any city.
        Although few residents spoke English, its presence
        was everywhere. For example, many road, building, and billboard signs
        were in English; police cars were prominently labeled with the word
        “police”; airplane and train schedules were announced in English;
        Christmas carols were piped-in at the ubiquitous, familiar fast-food
        restaurants; and rock, rap, and jazz music was played on the radio.
        Considerable hospitality and friendship were
        extended to me, including much sympathy for the World Trade Center
        terrorist attack. Overall, there seemed to be a sincere desire to move
        into the twenty-first century as friends of America, not adversaries,
        and to work together for mutually beneficial economic growth. 
        Procedure:
        
Unlike
        spinal cord nerves, peripheral nerves have considerable regenerative
        potential and the ability to establish new neuronal connections. 
        Building upon these capabilities, Zhang surgically reroutes and
        connects a peripheral nerve that emanates from the spinal cord above the
        point of injury to nerves or nerve roots below the injury. Hence, a
        viable neuronal connection from the brain to the previously
        paralysis-affected body area is created, restoring some function.
        The nature of the restored function depends upon
        the specific functions that the target nerves serve (e.g., leg muscle
        function, bladder and bowel control, sensation, etc). For example, the
        rerouted nerve could be connected to a nerve that controls urination, or
        it could be reconnected to nerve that controls upper leg muscles.
        Alternatively, if the rerouted nerve is connected
        to a general nerve root system, function in the overall physical area
        controlled by this system will be restored. One surgical rerouting
        designed to restore a specific function does not preclude a future
        rerouting to restore a different function. (Because this article
        extensively refers to different spinal cord and dermatome sensation
        levels, readers are encouraged to consult the illustrations for
        reference).
          
        Many possible rerouting arrangements exist. Zhang
        commonly reroutes one of the intercostal nerv
es
        that lead from the spinal cord around each rib to the sternum. If the
        intercostal nerve is not long enough to reach the target nerve site
        below the injury level, a segment of the sural nerve (isolated from the
        calf) is attached to the intercostal nerve.
        If the injury site is above the thoracic area where
        the intercostal nerves originate, other peripheral nerves can be
        selected. For example, in several cases, Zhang has rerouted the ulnar
        nerve, which leads down to the wrist originating from the C8-T1 spinal
        cord region, a procedure Italy’s Brunelli has also used.
        In addition to the intercostal and ulnar nerves,
        peripheral-nerve-rerouting options can restore function for virtually
        any level of injury. For example, in high-level injuries, functional
        peripheral nerves above the injury site (e.g
.,
        cervical plexus nerve branches originating from the higher cervical
        regions) can be connected to nearby dysfunctional nerves below the
        injury site (e.g., brachial plexus nerves originating from the lower
        cervical regions), potentially restoring respiratory ability to a
        previously ventilator-dependent quadriplegic.
        Zhang’s patients have lost little function in the
        original area served by the donor nerve because of nerve redundancy, the
        availability of multiple nerve branches, or the creation of alternative
        connections. For example, rerouting one of the many rib-associated,
        intercostal nerves will result in little functional loss. In the case of
        ulnar nerve rerouting, alternative nerve connections can be created to
        the hand and wrist.
        Although improvement in some cases is quickly
        apparent, restored function will gradually accrue over 12-18 months
        depending upon the specific surgical complexity.
        While the procedure isn’t precluded for older
        patients, younger patients with greater inherent regenerative potential
        often benefit more from peripheral nerve rerouting. 
        In addition, as more time passes after injury, the surgery may
        become less feasible, especially for lower-level injuries.
        In spite of intimidating neuroanatomical
        terminology, peripheral-nerve rerouting is conceptually relatively easy
        to understand. For example, visualize a house in which the power to the
        back bedroom is lost (i.e., area below the injury) due to a burned-out
        master electrical cable (i.e. the spinal cord injury). Instead of fixing
        the master cable, you disconnect the wire that powers the living-room
        television (i.e., a nerve to the rib or wrist region), tunnel it through
        the walls, and splice it directly to the bedroom wiring, circumventing
        the damaged section of master cable.
        If the redirected wire isn’t long enough to reach
        the bedroom, you splice an intervening piece of wire (i.e., the sural
        nerve) cut out from a part of the basement you rarely use. In order not
        to lose television function, you simply insert the TV plug into another
        living room outlet (i.e., establish alternate connections). Although
        this procedure may not be as desirable as replacing the master cable,
        you, nevertheless, now have power in the back bedroom.
        Case Studies:
        I observed Zhang carry out peripheral
        nerve-rerouting operations in three individuals with SCI. In addition, I
        have interacted with two former patients.
        Case #1: 
        Last year, 31-year old Yang acquired a T9-10 injury after falling
        at work.  The surgery’s
        primary goal was to restore some of Yang’s lower extremity function,
        especially bladder control. Yang’s 3-4-hour surgery was the most
        involved of the three operations I observed. 
        Initially, Zhang detached for later use a sural
        nerve segment from Yang’s calf.  He
        then proceeded to isolate an intercostal nerve from Yang’s rib region,
        maintaining the nerve’s connection to the spinal cord. Next, Zhang
        exposed Yang’s sacral nerve roots that control urogenital muscles.
        After he sutured the detached sural nerve segment to the intercostal
        nerve to make it long enough to reach this sacral region, the combined
        intercostal-sural nerve was connected to the sacral nerve roots. 
        Yang demonstrated some restored sensation in body areas
        controlled by the recipient sacral nerves (see dermatome chart) hours
        after surgery (This quick initial recovery is due to decompression).
        Case 2: 
        Although 31-year old Wang had retained some hip function after
        his lumbar injury, he had lost bladder control. In this case, a nerve
        that led to Wang’s functional hip was connected to a nearby
        dysfunctional nerve that served the urinary system. Specifically, the
        gluteus inferior nerve (originating from the L-5, S-1,2 spinal-cord
        level) that innervates the gluteus maximus muscle was connected to the
        injury-affected pudendal nerve (originating from the S-2,3,4 spinal-cord
        level) that serves the urogenital muscles. Because of the nerves’
        physical proximity, no intervening graft was needed. Overall, this was a
        much less complicated operation, requiring only an hour to complete.
        Case 3: Although
        involving a peripheral nerve SCI treatment, the third surgery
        represented a fundamentally different procedure, which Zhang has
        performed in more than 12 patients, and is included because of its
        radical nature.
        This case involved
        36-year old Chu, who had recently become a C-4 quadriplegic due to a
        construction accident. In Chu’s operation, detached, sural nerve
        segments were inserted directly into his injured spinal cord. These
        segments were initially scraped to expose nerve fibers and, after scar
        tissue was removed from and incisions made in the remaining cord,
        inserted lengthwise without suturing. The next day, Chu, who had
        previously possessed only residual bicep function, was able to move his
        hands.
        Follow-Up
        Case 1:  Huocheng
        acquired a T11-12 injury in a 1997 motorcycle accident when he was 25.
        The following year, Zhang rerouted an intercostal nerve from one side of
        Huocheng’s body to the lumbar nerve roots and, in turn, an intercostal
        nerve from the opposite side of his body to the sacral nerve roots.
        These two nerve reroutings together restored much of 
Huocheng’s
        lower extremity function. For example, he now has considerable upper-leg
        muscle control  and
        sensation down to his feet. Huocheng can now walk with crutches without
        leg braces and has greatly improved bowel and bladder control.
        Follow-Up Case 2: In 1989, Bido became
        injured in the lumbar region at age 17 after a car accident in Iceland.
        After rehabilitation, she was able to walk using hip muscles in
        conjunction with stiff braces that extended to her waist. Bido is the
        daughter of Audur Gudjonsdottir, who was recently honored as Iceland’s
        “Woman of the Year” for ongoing SCI advocacy efforts, including
        spearheading the aforementioned WHO conference.
        
        
After
        a facilitating request from Iceland’s President Vigdis Finnbogadottir,
        Zhang traveled to Iceland in 1995 to surgically repair and remove scar
        tissue from Bido’s spinal area. Audur, a nurse, indicated that so much
        scar tissue was removed that “both of my hands were full of it.”
        That operation alone restored some function. Audur believes that “each
        individual who sustains SCI should have an operation like that some time
        after the accident.” She adds: “as expected, the body attempts to
        heal itself with scar tissue, which is a band aid. When the band aid is
        removed and the pressure alleviated from the spinal cord or the nerve
        roots, things begin to work again.”
        In 1996, Zhang returned to Iceland to reroute
        Bido’s intercostal nerve to her lumbar nerve roots. As a result of
        these surgeries, Bido’s ambulatory ability has greatly improved even
        though the surgeries occurred many years after injury. According to
        Audur, “Bido has motor function in both legs down to the ankles. As
        such, she is now able to walk using braces that end below the knees. She
        bends both knees during walking, and her balance is much better.”
        Conclusion:
        Increasingly, it seems that the most exciting SCI
        therapeutic breakthroughs are originating in numerous places other than
        America. Although American neuroscience is unrivaled, for a variety of
        reasons - the pros and cons of which can be debated extensively - it has
        been difficult to translate this scientific excellence into real-world
        SCI therapies. Even when the initial scientific breakthrough happens in
        America, the bench-to-bedside transfer of knowledge that transforms this
        breakthrough into useful therapies often seems to occur elsewhere.  
        One potential reason has been implied by
        Christopher Reeve, the well-known actor with SCI whose foundation
        greatly contributes to and influences the nature of SCI research in this
        country. Commenting on a peripheral nerve-routing operation carried by
        Italy’s Brunelli, Reeve has stated “I think it is pretty immoral
        because you have to follow a sequence. You’ve got to go from rats, a
        lot of rats. Then you have to go to bigger animals, pigs hopefully, not
        monkeys. You’ve got to demonstrate safety and efficacy.” (see
        http://care cureatinfopop.com).
        Reeve’s opinion reflects the prevailing
        conservative approach of the American SCI research community, which
        believes that serving its needs for scientific rigor is the best way to
        serve the needs of people with SCI for new therapeutic options. However,
        as someone who was extensively involved in setting SCI research
        priorities in this community, I believe that the cows will come home a
        long, long time before the pigs tell us anything truly useful.
        Dr. Zhang’s peripheral-nerve-rerouting approaches
        appear extraordinarily promising for restoring significant function
        after SCI.  In the spirit of
        cooperation, we need to open-mindedly develop synergistic, mutually
        beneficial collaborations that can evaluate innovative procedures such
        as his and, more importantly, facilitate new understandings. One of
        Zhang’s foremost desires is to see a professional exchange in which
        his colleagues and their American counterparts would be able to visit
        and learn from each other’s experience.
        Society’s continued evolution into a “global
        village” has allowed us to share technology so we can order a
        comparable McDonalds Big Mac hamburger regardless of whether we are in
        China or America. Given that we can share such culinary technology, it
        would be an absurd sense of priorities not to be able to somehow share
        SCI therapeutic knowledge that would benefit so many.
        If we can bring together all the exciting SCI
        developments throughout the world, restoration of function would no
        longer be some distant pie-in-the-sky dream but a real-world expectation
        now. It’s time to pull it all together. No more excuses. Let’s roll.
        Acknowledgements & Resources: Special
        thanks are extended to Dr. Shaocheng Zhang, his colleagues, and
        superiors for extensive hospitality. Dr. Zhang can be reached by mail at
        32-43-301, Zhongyuan Rd., Shanghai 200433, China or by fax at
        001-86(country code)-21(city code)- 65346003.
        For more-technical summaries
        of Dr.
        Zhang’s peripheral nerve rerouting procedures, click here.
        For those who are potentially interested in this
        peripheral nerve rerouting surgery, Zhang is willing to consider foreign
        patients, who would stay in a modern foreign-guest clinic or is willing
        to travel to America to carry out the surgery if an appropriate
        collaborative relationship can be established with an U.S. hospital.
          
        
        Adapted from article appearing in Paraplegia News, April, 2002 (For subscriptions, contact www.pn-magazine.com).